Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions (was Re: [context] new version - support for Win64)
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-26 21:39:43


On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>> Trac can be (and I think, should be) abandoned for something that
>> reflects better the workflow that Boost would want to encourage and
>> that performs better on the machine that is available to it. If the
>> solution is hosted for Boost then I would say it would be better.
>
> I for one am very pleased with Trac.  I find it very helpful as it is.
>

Right, but if you had something else in place that gave you what Trac
gives *and* is faster, more pleasant to use, and had a lot more good
things going for it -- like it being hosted not by the Boost server --
then maybe you'd like whatever that is too? :D

-- 
Dean Michael Berris
about.me/deanberris

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk