Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions (was Re: [context] new version - support for Win64)
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-27 00:12:32

Dean Michael Berris wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>>> Trac can be (and I think, should be) abandoned for something that
>>> reflects better the workflow that Boost would want to encourage and
>>> that performs better on the machine that is available to it. If the
>>> solution is hosted for Boost then I would say it would be better.
>> I for one am very pleased with Trac. I find it very helpful as it is.
> Right, but if you had something else in place that gave you what Trac
> gives *and* is faster, more pleasant to use, and had a lot more good
> things going for it -- like it being hosted not by the Boost server --
> then maybe you'd like whatever that is too? :D

Would you mind suggesting a specific project management tool, as well
as hosting thereof, and migration scripts?

I'm sorry to be blunt, but it has been a long thread, and so far, I
don't see any specific engineering suggestions being made, or
specific problems listed -- rather, this seems to be a general
talk about how good git is in solving Linu{x,s}' problems.

- Volodya

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at