Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Phoenix3 Status update.
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-27 00:14:01

On 12/26/2010 11:53 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> On 12/24/2010 5:48 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
>>> BTW, what about compile time? Have you had any success with the
>>> preprocessor idea? To be honest, my biggest concern is the compile
>>> time of V3 phoenix over V2. Compile time is already an issue with
>>> Spirit2. Now we'll be adding more on top of it.
>> Compile time without preprocessing is better than with phoenix2.
> Really? Do you have some numbers? I don't see how preprocessed
> phoenix3 can be faster than preprocessed phoenix2.

I took this to mean that preprocessed phx3 compiled faster that
(un-preprocessed) phx2. That means that if fusion, proto and phx3 all
used the mpl trick of shipping pre-preprocessed headers, the compile
time problems would go away.

Thomas, is that what you meant?

Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at