Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions (was Re: [context] new version - support for Win64)
From: Oliver Kowalke (k-oli_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-28 05:05:35
Am 27.12.2010 21:05, schrieb Vladimir Prus:
> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>> 4. Change the review process instead from a
>> submission->review->inclusion process that's rigidly scheduled to one
>> that is less rigid and is more fluid.
> I think that the current review process is actually good.
How much libs are in the review queue and how long are they waiting for
a review (my libs are waiting for more than one year)?
The review process is very slow and could be much faster (at least for me).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk