Re: [boost] [Fusion] begin/end ADL issues with C++0x range-based for

Subject: Re: [boost] [Fusion] begin/end ADL issues with C++0x range-based for
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-30 00:09:18

AMDG

On 12/21/2010 12:29 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
> I would like to see a situation where finding boost::fusion::begin/end 
> via ADL is actually useful (i.e., couldn't be replaced by explicit 
> qualification).  Until then, I believe preventing 
> boost::fusion::begin/end (and, possibly, boost::begin/end) from being 
> found via ADL is a better solution; further, it explicitly discourages 
> any future code from relying on ADL (assuming that relying on ADL 
> *should* be discouraged).

ADL for Fusion may be convenient in some cases,
but it should never be necessary because fusion::begin/end
are not the customization points.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe