Subject: Re: [boost] [Fusion] begin/end ADL issues with C++0x range-based for
From: Michel MORIN (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-30 13:54:31
> ADL for Fusion may be convenient in some cases,
Such as I/O and comparisons?
BTW, I'm curious to know which is better in this case:
- Define Fusion sequences in an ADL-barrier namespace. For the functions
that need to be found via ADL, also define them in that namespace.
- Define Fusion's begin/end (and other functions that should NOT be found
via ADL) in an ADL barrier namespace.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk