Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-01 04:41:40
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 12/28/2010 3:34 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> I'd be very much against the idea of checking 4 different sites as
>> opposed to 1 -- at least, until I have 4 pairs of hand to work on
>> 4 different projects at the same time. In fact, I so much dislike
>> having to check N different issue trackers that I have a student working
>> on a tool to present issues from different trackers in a single UI.
>> until that project is done, I'd much rather not having things split up
> I very strongly agree. Â I periodically go through every open
> ticket in trac. Â Having separate issue trackers would make this
> practically impossible.
Interesting point. Definitely well taken.
I just wonder though how that practice of "periodically going through
every open ticket in Trac" scales. Is it just me who doesn't do this
and who would rather focus on libraries that actually mean more to me?
-- Dean Michael Berris about.me/deanberris
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk