|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-01 13:17:50
AMDG
On 1/1/2011 1:41 AM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Steven Watanabe<watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I very strongly agree. I periodically go through every open
>> ticket in trac. Having separate issue trackers would make this
>> practically impossible.
> Interesting point. Definitely well taken.
>
> I just wonder though how that practice of "periodically going through
> every open ticket in Trac" scales.
I don't know. It hasn't been a problem up to 1000 tickets.
I think I could still handle it up to a few times larger.
Anyway I don't do this all the time, so it's okay if it
takes a while.
> Is it just me who doesn't do this
> and who would rather focus on libraries that actually mean more to me?
I expect that most people are like you in this respect.
I do think that it is important for someone to do
so that critical and/or trivial tickets against less
well maintained libraries don't slip through the
cracks.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk