Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions (was Re: [context] new version - support for Win64)
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-01 11:20:56
On Jan 1, 2011, at 5:12 AM, Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> But what's happening at the moment is that people who *like* the
> collaborative process *aren't* supported explicitly by the current
> Boost process. This means what's happening is, the current Boost
> process is imposing upon me the way to develop a library that I want
> to develop and am already developing.
I don't see how boost fails to support collaboration. Anyone is free to use Git (or whatever) and whatever community resources they want. Nearly everything I've done within boost has been a collaboration.
BoostPro Computing * http://boostpro.com
[Sent from coveted but awkward mobile device]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk