Subject: Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB (license changed to BSL)?
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-10 16:04:25
> > Boost Interest
> > --------------
> > [snip]
> > So before I do any steps forward "Boostification"
> > may be it is better to make sure it gets (or even
> > passes the review) and then boostify the library
> > (which can be done very easily).
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> Extremely useful.
> I guess it needs to be boostified before it will pass a review though.
> - Christian
I understand this procedure... But rather I would ask a question.
When and how it would go to review.
My current situation:
- Boost.Locale - I currently maintain two versions: CppCMS's one
and Boost one - because I need it and on the other side it is not in boost.
- It is stuck in the review queue for about half a year.
- I did big boostification effort and I pay for it.
So should I do same mistake with CppDB and wait for another year to get
it reviewed and maintain two versions?
On the other hand I don't see any reason why it can't be
reviewed this way.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk