Subject: Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB (license changed to BSL)?
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-10 16:23:17
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Monday 10 January 2011, Artyom wrote:
> When and how it would go to review.
> My current situation:
> - Boost.Locale - I currently maintain two versions: CppCMS's one
> and Boost one - because I need it and on the other side it is not in
> boost. - It is stuck in the review queue for about half a year.
> - I did big boostification effort and I pay for it.
> So should I do same mistake with CppDB and wait for another year to get
> it reviewed and maintain two versions?
Just to put out an idea: it seems to me developers tend to be more
interested in submitting libraries than doing reviews or being review
managers. Maybe boost could balance the scales by requiring library
submitters to either be a review manager or review a couple submissions
from others before their library can be accepted.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk