Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB (license changed to BSL)?

Subject: Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB (license changed to BSL)?
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-10 16:23:17

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 10 January 2011, Artyom wrote:
> When and how it would go to review.
>
> My current situation:
>
> - Boost.Locale - I currently maintain two versions: CppCMS's one
>   and Boost one - because I need it and on the other side it is not in
> boost. - It is stuck in the review queue for about half a year.
> - I did big boostification effort and I pay for it.
>
> So should I do same mistake with CppDB and wait for another year to get
> it reviewed and maintain two versions?

Just to put out an idea: it seems to me developers tend to be more 
interested in submitting libraries than doing reviews or being review 
managers.  Maybe boost could balance the scales by requiring library 
submitters to either be a review manager or review a couple submissions 
from others before their library can be accepted.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0reMcACgkQ5vihyNWuA4U3awCgm9C+CIp24+3S0IlQRxFsAFYq
t2AAoOd672nX3mknaH1PAJXepwGR4JA6
=42BC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----