Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB (license changed to BSL)?

Subject: Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB (license changed to BSL)?
From: Joachim Faulhaber (afojgo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-10 20:56:47

2011/1/10 Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 10 January 2011, Artyom wrote:
>> When and how it would go to review.
>>
>> My current situation:
>>
>> - Boost.Locale - I currently maintain two versions: CppCMS's one
>>   and Boost one - because I need it and on the other side it is not in
>> boost. - It is stuck in the review queue for about half a year.
>> - I did big boostification effort and I pay for it.
>>
>> So should I do same mistake with CppDB and wait for another year to get
>> it reviewed and maintain two versions?
>
> Just to put out an idea: it seems to me developers tend to be more
> interested in submitting libraries than doing reviews or being review
> managers.  Maybe boost could balance the scales by requiring library
> submitters to either be a review manager or review a couple submissions
> from others before their library can be accepted.

+1
That's what I thought:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2010/05/166423.php

Maybe it's time to refresh those ideas and to implement them instead
of only discussing them.

Cheers,
Joachim

-- 
Interval Container Library [Boost.Icl]
http://www.joachim-faulhaber.de