Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB (license changed to BSL)?

Subject: Re: [boost] [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB (license changed to BSL)?
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-11 09:12:31

On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:27:54 -0600
Christian Holmquist <c.holmquist_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> [...] The problem with lack of review managers has been going on for a
> while, how about this (already suggested maybe?):
> Split the review manager into two positions:
>
> *  Responsible person 1 - Has knowledge on Boost's infrastructure,
> such as, tools, documentation, test and other best practices that
> should be followed by all libraries. Has enough background in boost to
> make a sound judgement when the review ends based on the discussions,
> without getting into the gritty details of the code or domain at hand.
>
> * Responsible person 2 - Has knowledge about the domain and will take
> more active part in guiding the library towards boost's standards in
> terms of generic programming etc.. [...]

+1.
-- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*