Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-15 17:30:46
On 1/15/2011 2:11 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> vicente.botet wrote:
>> You are right, and I forget often to replace this file, but usualy it
>> doesn't changes to much. The ideal will be that this file include a
>> all.hpp file included on the library directory. Other have proposed
>> someting like
> or #include<boost/flyweight/include.hpp> for the convenience header.
> actually, I might be ok with each library permitting ONE
> #include<boost/flyweight.hpp> // convenience header.
I favor this approach because it's already common practice.
I don't consider any of the arguments against it that
I've seen sufficient to justify going to something new.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk