Re: [boost] [bitfield] documentation does not build

Subject: Re: [boost] [bitfield] documentation does not build
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-16 09:27:48

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Edward Diener" <eldiener_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [bitfield] documentation does not build

> On 1/16/2011 4:30 AM, vicente.botet wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Edward Diener"<eldiener_at_[hidden]>
>> To:<boost_at_[hidden]>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 1:03 AM
>> Subject: [boost] [bitfield] documentation does not build

>> I had not rebuilt the doc since 3 Mai 2009. I have copied the directory bitfield  on the trunk/libs and I have no problems building it even the pdf. Could you show from which directory hierarchy are you building?
> 
> I retrieved the bitfield library from the vault, which is the link given 
> on the review schedule page at 
> http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html .
> 
> After getting bitfield from the vault as a zip file, I expanded it into 
> its own directory beneath the main sandbox directory, went to its 
> libs/integer/doc directory and ran:
> 
> bjam --boost=path/to/boost toolset=msvc-10.0
> 
> where the path/to/boost points to the latest version in the trunk. I 
> received the errors in my original post.
> 
> I also see there is another libs/integer in Boost, so that I think you 
> must rename your own subdirectory to 'bitfield' instead. I do not know 
> why you chose 'integer'. I think you should be following the recommended 
> directory structure for sandbox libraries even if your library is in the 
> vault instead.

I followed the same schema than Boost.Endian as both libraries should be part of Boost.Integer. But I understand that the documentation needs to renamed.

Best,
Vicente