Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-18 11:27:22

Next message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] can BOOST_ASSERT have method calls?"
Previous message: Chad Nelson: "Re: [boost] [General] Always treat std::strings as UTF-8"
In reply to: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings."
Next in thread: Patrick Horgan: "Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings."

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of Stewart, Robert
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:08 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.
>
> Patrick Horgan wrote:
> > On 01/14/2011 06:43 AM, Philipp Reh wrote:
> >
> > > -Wall -Wextra -pedantic(-errors) is a must for gcc.
> [snip]
> >
> > I agree with that and that's what I use in my own code.
> [snip]
>
> -pedantic is a pain if you use, for example, #ident. So far as I know,
there's no
> way to reduce the resulting noise.

I trust someone will document that useful (if annoying) info? (Patrick?)

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow,
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB  UK
+44 1539 561830  07714330204
pbristow_at_[hidden]

Next message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] can BOOST_ASSERT have method calls?"
Previous message: Chad Nelson: "Re: [boost] [General] Always treat std::strings as UTF-8"
In reply to: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings."
Next in thread: Patrick Horgan: "Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk