Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 08:02:04


----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Watanabe" <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.

> AMDG
>
> On 1/12/2011 5:07 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
>> *Borland*
>>
>> Information needed here.
>
> At the moment, I think compiler errors
> would matter a lot more than mere warnings.
> Feel free to correct me, but my impression
> from the regression matrix is that support
> for this compiler is practically nil.

+1. Seen the number of librarie sthat don't work with this compiler I don't understand what is the goal to continue running regression test for Borland compiler.

Best,
Vicente


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk