Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.

Subject: Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 08:06:49

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:02 PM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand what is the goal to continue running regression test for Borland compiler.
>

In the off-chance that somehow a newer version of the Borland compiler
actually starts becoming capable of building Boost I guess, having
regression tests there would be a pleasant surprise to everyone.

The other is so that we actually have validation that the Borland
compiler is FUBAR. Over and over again. :)

HTH

-- 
Dean Michael Berris
about.me/deanberris