Subject: Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 08:06:49
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:02 PM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I don't understand what is the goal to continue running regression test for Borland compiler.
In the off-chance that somehow a newer version of the Borland compiler
actually starts becoming capable of building Boost I guess, having
regression tests there would be a pleasant surprise to everyone.
The other is so that we actually have validation that the Borland
compiler is FUBAR. Over and over again. :)
-- Dean Michael Berris about.me/deanberris
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk