Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]
From: Patrick Horgan (phorgan1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-20 04:36:22

Next message: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Previous message: Michel MORIN: "[boost] [Phoenix-3] Is Actor assignable?"
In reply to: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Next in thread: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Reply: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"

On 01/19/2011 09:39 PM, Artyom wrote:
>> ... elision by patrick ...
> Short reminder:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1049947/should-utf-16-be-considered-harmful
Dueling reminder:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Unicode.html

Patrick

Next message: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Previous message: Michel MORIN: "[boost] [Phoenix-3] Is Actor assignable?"
In reply to: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Next in thread: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"
Reply: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk