Subject: Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-20 00:39:48
> > Boost can and **should** decide - we use Unicode - and
> > we use UTF-8 as all frameworks did.
> Except for all the UTF-16 frameworks you cited above?
- Qt support UTF-16 only from version 4, before that Qt3 supported only UCS-2!
(At it wasn't long time ago)
- Java Supports UTF-16 from 1.5 before UCS-2
- Windows somehow supports UTF-16 starting from XP
- MS SQL Server does not support UTF-16 yet (only UCS-2)
I can continue...
UTF-16 is a "historical mistake" because some (long)
time ago Unicode supposed to be 16 bit,
and in those days 16 bit character was very reasonable but
it didn't worked - so UTF-16 was invented.
No modern project should pick it as it give more problems
Not to mention that before char16_t would be supported in
all compiler it would be hard time to support it in C++.
(and not wchar_t is not good for UTF-16)
Just a small point before we may think of picking
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk