Subject: Re: [boost] Stack-based vector container
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-23 02:52:34
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Stephan T. Lavavej
> The As If Rule always applies, but I can confidently say that nobody's compiler and Standard Library implementation conspires in such a way.
Right, so it remains theoretical.
My point was that the benefits of a stack-based vector type are also
theoretical. Practically speaking, if std::vector is causing
performance problems, I don't see myself thinking "ok, I need a
stack-based vector." In that case, it makes more sense to me to throw
all abstraction out and get down to the metal.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk