Re: [boost] Stack-based vector container

Subject: Re: [boost] Stack-based vector container
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-23 02:52:34

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Stephan T. Lavavej
<stl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The As If Rule always applies, but I can confidently say that nobody's compiler and Standard Library implementation conspires in such a way.

Right, so it remains theoretical.

My point was that the benefits of a stack-based vector type are also
theoretical. Practically speaking, if std::vector is causing
performance problems, I don't see myself thinking "ok, I need a
stack-based vector." In that case, it makes more sense to me to throw
all abstraction out and get down to the metal.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode