Subject: Re: [boost] [assert][lightweight_test] Quick review of proposed changes
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-23 12:32:06
Beman Dawes wrote:
> BOOST_ENABLE_ASSERT_MSG_HANDLER enables a separate error handler.
I think that the existing BOOST_ENABLE_ASSERT_HANDLER should control the
behavior of BOOST_ASSERT_MSG as well. It's very unlikely that users will
want one of the macros to go to their own handler, and the other to keep
calling std::abort, and in the current implementation, this is what will
happen silently in existing projects that already define
BOOST_ENABLE_ASSERT_HANDLER. I suspect that such users will prefer a
link-time error, alerting them to the presence of BOOST_ASSERT_MSG macros in
> * Messages are now sent do BOOST_LIGHTWEIGHT_TEST_OSTREAM
I'm sorry if I missed the explanation for it... what is the use case of this
You should add your name to the copyright.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk