Subject: Re: [boost] [string] proposal
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-24 20:43:56
At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:34:54 -0500,
Chad Nelson wrote:
> > Sure, however I personally don't see the value of making the encoding
> > an intrinsic property of a string object. [...]
> Then I think we have different purposes, and I'll absent myself from
> this part of the discussion after this reply.
I think there *might* be a miscommunication here. IIUC, Dean is
saying that he doesn't necessarily see a reason that a string's
encoding needs to be exposed in its interface.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk