Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a simple buffer abstraction?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-27 09:44:05
On 27/01/2011 15:10, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> You probably mean "freeing said buffer" instead of "copying said buffer".
> The simplest approach would be to stipulate that such a buffer should be
> allocated with operator new and freed with operator delete.
Oh and calling delete (or delete for that matter) on a different type
than the one that was used for new/new (or a non-base type if the
destructor is virtual) is undefined behaviour.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk