Subject: Re: [boost] [string] proposal
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-27 13:51:27
On 27 January 2011 10:34, Matus Chochlik <chochlik_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hmm, is the following a dumb idea?
> Implement the old interface for backward compatibility.
Can't. Run-time complexity guarantees are part of the interface, as far as
the standard is concerned.
I'd like to see this broken up into three discussions:
1. Immutable strings.
2. utf8 strings.
3. Unrealistic pipe dream about replacing std::string.
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk