Subject: Re: [boost] UTF strings thread (was [string] proposal)
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-27 13:38:23
David Bergman wrote:
> BUT, the thing is that The Other Discussion is still
> mentioning encoding notions and even the letters "UTF", and
> it should. Otherwise, that thread should be called
> "boost::immutable_vector" or "boost::cs_immutable_string" ;-)
Dean was proposing a CS string-like type (which he called "string") as the underlying, immutable storage type to be used in various ways to assemble pieces to be transmitted, encoded, decoded, etc. His "view" type is akin to what you wish to discuss and its viability does depend upon the immutability of the underlying storage. The discussions are much more about mutability versus immutability than anything else once you get past the names and Dean's separation of storage and view types.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk