Re: [boost] [string] proposal

Subject: Re: [boost] [string] proposal
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-28 05:17:04

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Matus Chochlik <chochlik_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Dean Michael Berris
> <mikhailberis_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Chad Nelson
> [snip/]
>>>
>>> The "istring" you mentioned in a later message is good enough for this
>>> discussion, though it might not be descriptive enough for a final name.
>>
>> I agree. Help wanted on a better name for the immutable string. :)
>>
> Half-jokingly, but: what about 'chain' ? :)
>

LOL -- chain I like. It's one less character than `string`. It
involves immutability, concatenation as a means of building it, and
it's usually segmented.

Brilliant I say. Any other ideas? If not then I like the sound of
Boost.Chains :D

-- 
Dean Michael Berris
about.me/deanberris