Subject: Re: [boost] Survey: What should an immutable byte sequence data structure be named?
From: Daniel Trebbien (dtrebbien_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-29 10:45:33
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Gregory Crosswhite
> Hey everyone,
> To gather more data about what the community thinks an immutable byte
> sequence data structure should be called (given that "string" has already
> been taken), I have created the following poll:
> Â Â https://catalyst.uw.edu/webq/survey/gcross/123312
> If you have an opinion on the matter, please consider visiting the above
> link and submitting your favorite name.
> Some names that have been tossed around are istring, immutable_string,
> chain, rope, yarn, twine, cord, but don't feel limited to these choices.
> Gregory Crosswhite
I suggested `bytes`. I think that this plays well with the STL style
of keeping names short and succinct, and it also makes sense when
considering that the compile-time constant ratio template is named
To me, `chain`, `rope`, `yarn`, `twine`, and `cord` have special
meanings or indicate something special about the implementation,
especially `rope` and `cord` which make me think of the cord type that
is provided with the Boehm garbage collector
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk