Subject: Re: [boost] Process discussions
From: Matthias Schabel (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-31 12:05:37
> What's the point of comparison when you say "more" effective?
> How do you measure effectivity in the first place? As far as
> I know, Boost produces top notch libraries that are more effective
> than even a thousand GIT hosted open source libraries out there.
OTOH, there are a number of large domains where Boost does not
compete, either at all or effectively : ITK, VTK, FFTW, ATLAS are a few
open-source projects I have personally used and have found to be
substantially easier to deal with than Boost. That being said, I have
no doubt that Boost expertise could be very profitably applied in
those problem domains.
> As an analogy, an instant camera in the hands of a pro will produce
> superb results, while a top of the line DSLR camera in the hands
> of an amateur will never reach the same level of quality.
Unfortunately, it is extremely rare for the genius camera engineer to also
be a genius photographer, and vice versa... It is a little egotistical to believe
that one's facility and expertise in one area extends to another
completely different one.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk