Re: [boost] Process discussions

Subject: Re: [boost] Process discussions
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-31 14:39:00

Daniel James wrote:
> On 31 January 2011 10:10, John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > * The only tool comment I have is that SVN is awfully slow for big merges
> > (Math lib docs for example), I probably need to find a better way of using
> > the tool better though.
> 
> Maybe we could work on making boostbook generate more consistent
> output. I'm not sure how much of a difference that would make.
> 
> Alternatively, you could just not check in the documentation, and put
> the development and release version somewhere convenient.

It would be really great, if the ever changing global unique identifiers in boostbook generated output could be made to change less frequently, no matter which version control system is used. Because changing files that haven't really changed makes it more difficult to find out which changes have actually happened.

Regards,
Thomas