Re: [boost] Process discussions

Subject: Re: [boost] Process discussions
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-31 16:27:47

AMDG

On 1/31/2011 11:39 AM, Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>> On 31 January 2011 10:10, John Maddock<boost.regex_at_[hidden]>  wrote:
>>>
>>> * The only tool comment I have is that SVN is awfully slow for big merges
>>> (Math lib docs for example), I probably need to find a better way of using
>>> the tool better though.
>>
>> Maybe we could work on making boostbook generate more consistent
>> output. I'm not sure how much of a difference that would make.
>>
>> Alternatively, you could just not check in the documentation, and put
>> the development and release version somewhere convenient.
>
> It would be really great, if the ever changing global unique
> identifiers in boostbook generated output could be made to change
> less frequently, no matter which version control system is used.
> Because changing files that haven't really changed makes it more
> difficult to find out which changes have actually happened.
>

It shouldn't require huge changes.  For the most
part, the anchor names are based on the name
of whatever they're for.  There are just a few cases
that aren't handled.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe