Subject: Re: [boost] Process discussions
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-31 16:27:47
On 1/31/2011 11:39 AM, Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>> On 31 January 2011 10:10, John Maddock<boost.regex_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> * The only tool comment I have is that SVN is awfully slow for big merges
>>> (Math lib docs for example), I probably need to find a better way of using
>>> the tool better though.
>> Maybe we could work on making boostbook generate more consistent
>> output. I'm not sure how much of a difference that would make.
>> Alternatively, you could just not check in the documentation, and put
>> the development and release version somewhere convenient.
> It would be really great, if the ever changing global unique
> identifiers in boostbook generated output could be made to change
> less frequently, no matter which version control system is used.
> Because changing files that haven't really changed makes it more
> difficult to find out which changes have actually happened.
It shouldn't require huge changes. For the most
part, the anchor names are based on the name
of whatever they're for. There are just a few cases
that aren't handled.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk