Subject: Re: [boost] Git vs SVN - review
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-31 16:59:20
On 1/31/2011 2:42 PM, Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
> On 1/31/11 11:33 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
>> It is poor rhetoric like this which really leads to bad decision making.
> Hey, if that rhetoric was good enough for a widely esteemed Senator then
> it is good enough for the boost mailing list. :-)
Any rhetoric is good enough for politicians. I was hoping Boost
developers and users would be a cut above that. Vain hope I guess.
Nonetheless those people who are actually trying to speak about Git
without false effusion should really keep their remarks consistent with
some known reality.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk