Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Boost.Process done
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-02 07:55:05

Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 22:37, Claude Quézel wrote:
> > I noticed that the boost::process::child does not have a default
> > constructor. If I have a coding requirements like the following
> > example, I would be stuck:
> >
> > // Note the required default constructor
> > boost::process::child child;
> > {
> > boost::lock_guard<boost::mutex> guard(process_launch);
> > child = boost::process::launch(exec, args, ctx);
> > }
> How about
> template<typename Lockable>
> struct lock_maybe_guard
> {
> };
> boost::process::child child;

The default ctor is still needed, which was the OP's concern.

Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at