Subject: Re: [boost] Subject: Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library starts tomorrow
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-07 17:58:57
Steven Watanabe-4 wrote:
> On 2/7/2011 11:09 AM, Vicente Botet wrote:
>> for the moment I have started with the documentation. Here there are some
>> remarks and questions:
>> I would prefer to see in the Synopsis which functions are available on
>> specific platforms. Instead of
>> #if defined(BOOST_WINDOWS_API)
>> so it will be more clear what can be used.
> This isn't possible with the Doxygen/BoostBook
Hrrr. It's a shame :(
Well I will then be happy with a table compiling the differences.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Subject-Formal-Review-of-Proposed-Boost-Process-library-starts-tomorrow-tp3263607p3265350.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk