Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic] Status?
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-10 04:40:36

Next message: Yechezkel Mett: "Re: [boost] [Tokenizer]Usage and documentation"
Previous message: John Bytheway: "Re: [boost] Subject: Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library starts tomorrow"
In reply to: wash: "Re: [boost] [atomic] Status?"
Next in thread: Helge Bahmann: "Re: [boost] [atomic] Status?"

> We use a patched version Boost.Atomic at work (hacked on mostly by Hartmut
> Kaiser). I'd like to see our changes pushed upstream. Is this (candidate)
> library without a maintainer now?

in the meantime i would be interested to include your changes into the
boost.lockfree repository.

tim

-- 
tim_at_[hidden]
http://tim.klingt.org
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say
"I want to see the manager."
  William S. Burroughs

Next message: Yechezkel Mett: "Re: [boost] [Tokenizer]Usage and documentation"
Previous message: John Bytheway: "Re: [boost] Subject: Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library starts tomorrow"
In reply to: wash: "Re: [boost] [atomic] Status?"
Next in thread: Helge Bahmann: "Re: [boost] [atomic] Status?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk