Re: [boost] [string] Yet another Unicode string class

Subject: Re: [boost] [string] Yet another Unicode string class
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-10 17:01:35

On 10/02/2011 21:38, Anders Dalvander wrote:
> * It is (currently) using some C++0X features (mainly decltype).

I'm fairly sure that's unnecessary, aren't there range_traits that 
expose the type directly?
Also, for inclusion in Boost, it should probably use boost::begin, not 
std::begin.

Otherwise, there is not much to say without a real implementation to 
look at.