Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [interfaces] Boost Interface Library (2004?)
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-18 12:35:10

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Daniel Larimer <dlarimer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I do not like the boost::function problems either, it was more of a notional.  There is always this( drop in replacement for boost::function.

The article's analysis is wrong. From the beginning Boost.Function
used the "small object optimization" to avoid an "expensive heap
memory allocation that [would be] required to store the member
function and the bound object on which member function call is made"

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at