Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?
From: Pierre Morcello (pmorcell-cppfrance_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-28 17:59:08

Next message: Antoine de Maricourt: "Re: [boost] GSoC SIMD project"
Previous message: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [filesystem v3] [iostreams] [interprocess] no windows access to memory mapped file"
In reply to: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"
Reply: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"

On 28/02/2011 04:07, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote: > Hello all, > > Before I spend 2+ weeks updating Boost.Local docs... > can you please express an opinion about Boost.Local new and > simplified syntax? I prefer the simplified syntax over the original one. Well done! Best, Pierre

Next message: Antoine de Maricourt: "Re: [boost] GSoC SIMD project"
Previous message: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [filesystem v3] [iostreams] [interprocess] no windows access to memory mapped file"
In reply to: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"
Reply: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk