Subject: Re: [boost] [1.46.1] Should we try for a point release?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-01 22:47:17
Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 28 February 2011 04:27, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On 2/27/2011 10:28 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>>>> (2) We would need to be sure that we have a procedure that ensures
>>>> that fixes for the point release don't get dropped from the next
>>>> full release.
>>> Why wouldn't we just use the normal release branch? Then the changes
>>> would only need to be made once.
yeah, and while we're at it, why don't we just label it 1.47 ?
>> Are we doing this? I'm away this weekend so I'll need to get my side
>> of things sorted out pretty quickly.
> I'd like to. Would it help you if we scheduled it for the 9th?
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk