Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-15 07:41:03

Thomas Heller wrote:
> WRT naming i think we should strive for consistent naming in overall
> boost, not just the type_traits library. Proto, for example, names the
> operators as well, as does Boost.Operator.
> FWIW both libraries agree on left_shift/right_shift.
> 
> Please take that into consideration.

+1

The following list of names from Proto looks quite good to me, and doesn't seem to contain any "odd sounding" names like "operator_plus_equal"

<http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_1/doc/html/proto/users_guide.html#boost_proto.users_guide.intermediate_form.tags_and_metafunctions>

Regards,
Thomas