Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts

Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts
From: Joachim Faulhaber (afojgo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-15 16:56:22

2011/3/15 Vicente Botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>:
>
> Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
>>
>> 2011/3/15 Vicente Botet &lt;vicente.botet_at_[hidden]&gt;:
>>>
>>> In any case all the added functions should be accessible only if
>>> BOOST_CHRONO_EXTENSIONS is defined, so semantic compatibility with
>>> std::chrono is maintained.
>>
>> Is std::chrono already accepted and frozen in the new standard?
>>
>>
>
> It is accepted, and if I'm not wrong next week will be the next meeting for
> the C++ standard group, and I suspect that it should be the last one before
> the next c++0x is accepted. I guess that only bugs corrections are accepted
> now :(

This is unfortunate, since I intended to challenge its design fundamentally
(just kidding)   :-D