Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-15 18:15:17

Paul A. Bristow-2 wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
>> On Behalf Of Thomas Klimpel
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 11:41 AM
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic
>> Bron
>> 
>> Thomas Heller wrote:
>> > WRT naming i think we should strive for consistent naming in overall
>> > boost, not just the type_traits library. Proto, for example, names the
>> > operators as well, as does Boost.Operator.
>> The following list of names from Proto looks quite good to me, and
>> doesn't
>> seem to contain any "odd sounding" names like "operator_plus_equal"
>> 
>> <http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_1/doc/html/proto/users_guide.html#bo
> > ost_proto.users_guide.intermediate_form.tags_and_metafunctions>
> 
> There would seem to me to be a very strong case for having the same names
> as
> in Boost.Proto and Boost.Operator.
> 
> 

+1

Vicente

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Review-Boost-Type-Traits-Extension-by-Frederic-Bron-tp3353283p3357922.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.