Re: [boost] [tasklet] micro-tasks with cooperative scheduler

Subject: Re: [boost] [tasklet] micro-tasks with cooperative scheduler
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-19 04:42:21

Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> 
> Am 19.03.2011 01:40, schrieb Vicente Botet:
>>
>> What do you think about moving all the public classes (scheduler,
>> tasklet)
>> to the tasklets namespace.
>>
>>
> The classes are declared in namespace boost::tasklets. 
> 

This is good.

> I've put an using 
> declaration in namespace boost - isn't it appropriated?
> 

I recall a thread about avoiding polluting the boost namespace and requiring
a good reason to do so. 
I think we can try without the using and if the code is not readable then
look for alternatives that should be discussed in this ML.

Best,
Vicente

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/tasklet-micro-tasks-with-cooperative-scheduler-tp3388647p3389276.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.