|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] GSOC: concept_traits
From: Andrew Sutton (asutton.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-19 10:21:34
> My experience is that simple things are not always as simple as we thought.
> * Making it portable adds always a lot of issues.
> * Finding the correct names and interface is not an easy task as the
> TypeTraits operators review probes.
>
> Should I add a summary to the list of ideas?
Sure. I think that this is a good idea.
I might also point at my side project Origin
(http://code.google.com/p/origin/), which has a similar goal. I'm
basically incorporating concept checking classes and traits classes
into a uniform system with the intent of actually using them in other
libraries :) Of course this work is still in progress; I'm actually
working on them in a slightly different context. But the idea is the
same.
Andrew
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk