Re: [boost] lhs/rhs ([Review] Type Traits Extension ending tomorrow)

Subject: Re: [boost] lhs/rhs ([Review] Type Traits Extension ending tomorrow)
From: Max Sobolev (macsmr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-22 10:10:14

On 21.03.2011 21:06, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> it's a mistake to break with a well-established
> convention that works just on principle.  The chance that your
> alternative will work better in practice is extremely low.

I think that preference in /*hs/ names is some sort of (old) harmful 
habit, we must go away from this naming style. 50 years ago GOTO 
statement also were considered as excellent programming instrument. 
(progress isn't stayed)

Even if my naming convention isn't sufficient, this is not means that 
yours is good enough :) to use it (In general, we must formulate a new 
naming convention for binary operator arguments.)

-- 
- Do you speak English? Мужик с глубоким вздохом: - Yes I do. А хули толку?