Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [inspect] exceptions (FW: [Boost-users] no exceptions)
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-22 19:44:13


On 22 March 2011 23:27, Vicente BOTET <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Please, note that I'm not against we add more check to inspect

I'm vaguely against adding more inspection checks. We keep adding new
checks and not fixing the problems they report. The more errors in the
report that go unfixed, the more irrelevant it seems.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk