Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [context review] Formal Review
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-23 05:35:34


> This is my formal review.
>
> > Please always state in your review, whether you think the library should be
> > accepted as a Boost library!
>
> Yes, it should be a part of boost.
>
> (the alternative version with improved f/u-context support)
>

I want to add small notice.

The original review version had critical issue of
binary compatibility of different builds that can be
solved using template option (alternative system)
or using pimpl ideom.

So even for official reviewed version I vote
**Yes** under _condition_ that ABI issue is
going to be fixed in whatever way the author
seems to be correct.

Regards,
  Artyom Beilis

      


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk