Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Why Boost.Build?
From: Max Sobolev (macsmr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-31 02:40:02

Next message: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Algebraic abstractions related to (big) integers in C++"
Previous message: Vicente BOTET: "Re: [boost] Boost.Log status"
In reply to: Vicente BOTET: "Re: [boost] Why Boost.Build?"

On 30.03.2011 20:11, Vicente BOTET wrote:
>
> I like Boost.Build, and I think it responds to the needs the > developers of Boost have.
> CMake was included, I don't remember on which version, in a intrusive
> way without requesting even a review. Fortunately it has been removed
> from the official distribution.

+1

-- 
- Do you speak English? ÐœÑƒÐ¶Ð¸Ðº Ñ Ð³Ð»ÑƒÐ±Ð¾ÐºÐ¸Ð¼ Ð²Ð·Ð´Ð¾Ñ…Ð¾Ð¼: - Yes I do. Ð Ñ…ÑƒÐ»Ð¸ Ñ‚Ð¾Ð»ÐºÑƒ?

Next message: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Algebraic abstractions related to (big) integers in C++"
Previous message: Vicente BOTET: "Re: [boost] Boost.Log status"
In reply to: Vicente BOTET: "Re: [boost] Why Boost.Build?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk