Re: [boost] Boost.Log status

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Log status
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-31 04:09:58

On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:33 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> There are still a few things to be done before it can be included into
>> Boost. Most notably, port to Boost.Phoenix3 is still pending as
>> Boost.Phoenix3 has only recently been reviewed.
> 
> Ooh. Do you need to go down that rat hole? Is this 
> so critical that cannot be done after the library is added?

Not to be snarky, but I agree with the review results:
> Critical issues 
> =============== 
> 
> Use of a custom lambda implementation was pointed by many as not great -- we already have a couple, so let's not add more to the mix.
> 

It's possible that some of the "must fix" issues from a review can be fixed after release, though, right?

Cheers,
Gordon