Re: [boost] Boost.Log status

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Log status
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-31 04:44:54

On 31 March 2011 09:09, Gordon Woodhull <gordon_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Not to be snarky, but I agree with the review results:
>> Critical issues
>> ===============
>>
>> Use of a custom lambda implementation was pointed by many as not great -- we already have a couple, so let's not add more to the mix.
>>
>
> It's possible that some of the "must fix" issues from a review can be fixed after release, though, right?

A library needs to satisfy the requirements from its review before
it's added to trunk. But it could have used phoenix 2 to do that - if
only to get the library in trunk and the regression tests running
(which should be done as soon as possible). Anyway, phoenix 3 is in
trunk now.